AVinBrief

The commercial AV industry, in briefs you can read in under a minute.

← All briefs

Government · June 24, 2026

WolfVision Cynap Pro Evidence Presentation System: What a Wireless Collaboration Platform Designed for Courtrooms Means for Legal AV Integrators

WolfVision positioning its Cynap Pro platform as a purpose-built evidence presentation system for in-person, hybrid, and virtual court proceedings.

By AVinBrief Editorial Desk ·

What is an evidence presentation system?
An evidence presentation system is designed to support in-person, hybrid, and fully virtual courtroom proceedings, addressing the range of formats that courts across the United States have adopted since the pandemic accelerated remote hearings. The evidence presentation use case layers courtroom-specific workflow on top of AV infrastructure.
What is the Cynap Pro, and how does WolfVision's existing platform map to a courtroom application?
The Cynap Pro is WolfVision's wireless presentation and collaboration system, built around a standalone hardware unit that handles content sharing, screen mirroring, and multi-source switching without requiring a dedicated PC at the display. In a courtroom configuration, the platform is paired with the vSolution Matrix, WolfVision's distribution and control layer that routes video signals to multiple screens simultaneously (examples include counsel tables, witness stand, jury box, gallery, and the judge's bench) from a single managed source.
What courtroom-specific workflows does the Cynap Pro evidence presentation system address?
WolfVision's judicial solution handles the core evidence workflow: attorneys connecting devices wirelessly or via cable to present exhibits, the ability to annotate on-screen in real time, and judge-controlled or clerk-controlled content routing to individual displays. The vSolution Matrix component manages which screens receive which content at any moment, a requirement in proceedings where what the jury sees may differ from what is shown to the public gallery. The system also supports hybrid court configurations in which remote participants join via video conferencing while in-room evidence is simultaneously shared to all connected displays.
How does the Cynap Pro handle the connectivity requirements attorneys and court staff typically bring into a courtroom?
The Cynap Pro supports both wired HDMI input and wireless screen mirroring from Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Chromebook devices, without requiring a client application install on the presenting device. That last point matters in courtroom settings, where attorneys regularly appear with their own laptops and are unlikely to have pre-installed proprietary software. The system also supports direct USB-C input and AirPlay, Google Cast, and Miracast protocols natively.
What is the Cynap Pro's technical footprint, and how does it typically integrate into a room's existing AV infrastructure?
The Cynap Pro is a standalone unit with HDMI output to a display or AV matrix, a built-in web-based management interface, and network connectivity via wired Ethernet or Wi-Fi. It runs WolfVision's own embedded operating system and can be managed remotely through the company's cloud-based fleet management tools. In a courtroom deployment, the Cynap Pro typically feeds into the vSolution Matrix, which handles the multi-zone output routing. The unit is designed for rack or credenza mounting and does not require a co-located PC to operate.

The Take

What does the Cynap Pro's courtroom positioning tell AV integrators pursuing judicial market work?

Courtroom AV is one of the more exacting government verticals an integrator can pursue. The standards for evidence display are set partly by court administrators and partly by state and federal rules of evidence, which means the system has to work without ambiguity about who controls what and what each party can see. The impact of getting it wrong is consequential to the mission of justice. WolfVision’s move to market the Cynap Pro explicitly as an evidence presentation system, rather than as a general collaboration tool that happens to work in courtrooms, is a direct pitch to the judicial vertical’s procurement language.

For integrators with state and local government relationships, the relevant questions to take into the field: Does the system support content logging or audit trails for evidence presented during proceedings and what security and privacy governance then apply? What happens when an attorney’s device fails to connect mid-hearing? Is there a fallback input path? And how does the vSolution Matrix handle the distinction between what is shown to the jury versus what is visible to the public gallery when those outputs need to differ?

WolfVision’s judicial solution pages on their website suggest the platform has been deployed in U.S. courtrooms, which means reference sites likely exist for the asking.

Sources