AVinBrief

The commercial AV industry, in briefs you can read in under a minute.

← All briefs

Government · June 24, 2026

WolfVision Cynap Pro Evidence Presentation System: What a Wireless Collaboration Platform Designed for Courtrooms Means for Legal AV Integrators

WolfVision markets its Cynap Pro platform as a purpose-built evidence presentation system for in-person, hybrid, and virtual court proceedings.

By AVinBrief Editorial Desk · · Updated August 12, 2026

What is an evidence presentation system?
An evidence presentation system supports in-person, hybrid, and fully virtual courtroom proceedings, covering the range of formats courts across the United States have adopted since the pandemic accelerated remote hearings. The use case layers courtroom-specific workflow on top of AV infrastructure.
What is the Cynap Pro, and how does WolfVision's existing platform map to a courtroom application?
The Cynap Pro is WolfVision's wireless presentation and collaboration system, built around a standalone hardware unit that handles content sharing, screen mirroring, and multi-source switching without a dedicated PC at the display. In a courtroom configuration, the platform pairs with the vSolution Matrix, WolfVision's distribution and control layer, which routes video signals to multiple screens at once (counsel tables, witness stand, jury box, gallery, and the judge's bench) from a single managed source.
What courtroom-specific workflows does the Cynap Pro evidence presentation system address?
WolfVision's judicial solution handles the core evidence workflow. Attorneys connect devices wirelessly or by cable to present exhibits, annotate on-screen in real time, and route content to individual displays under judge or clerk control. The vSolution Matrix component manages which screens receive which content at any moment, a requirement in proceedings where what the jury sees may differ from what the public gallery sees. The system also supports hybrid court configurations, where remote participants join by video conferencing while in-room evidence shares simultaneously to all connected displays.
How does the Cynap Pro handle the connectivity requirements attorneys and court staff typically bring into a courtroom?
The Cynap Pro supports wired HDMI input and wireless screen mirroring from Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, and Chromebook devices, with no client application to install on the presenting device. That last point matters in courtrooms, where attorneys regularly appear with their own laptops and rarely carry pre-installed proprietary software. The system also handles direct USB-C input and the AirPlay, Google Cast, and Miracast protocols natively.
What is the Cynap Pro's technical footprint, and how does it typically integrate into a room's existing AV infrastructure?
The Cynap Pro is a standalone unit with HDMI output to a display or AV matrix, a built-in web-based management interface, and network connectivity over wired Ethernet or Wi-Fi. It runs WolfVision's own embedded operating system and can be managed remotely through the company's cloud-based fleet management tools. In a courtroom deployment, it feeds into the vSolution Matrix, which handles the multi-zone output routing. The unit mounts in a rack or credenza and needs no co-located PC to operate.

The Take

What does the Cynap Pro's courtroom positioning tell AV integrators pursuing judicial market work?

Courtroom AV is one of the more exacting government verticals an integrator can pursue. Court administrators and the state and federal rules of evidence together set the standards for evidence display, so the system has to work with no ambiguity about who controls what and what each party can see. Getting it wrong carries consequences for the mission of justice. By marketing the Cynap Pro explicitly as an evidence presentation system, rather than as a general collaboration tool that happens to work in courtrooms, WolfVision pitches straight into the judicial vertical’s procurement language.

Integrators with state and local government relationships have a few questions worth taking into the field. Does the system support content logging or audit trails for evidence presented during proceedings, and what security and privacy governance then apply? What happens when an attorney’s device fails to connect mid-hearing, and is there a fallback input path? And how does the vSolution Matrix handle the split between what the jury sees and what the public gallery sees when those outputs need to differ?

WolfVision points to U.S. courtroom deployments of the platform, so reference sites likely exist for the asking.

Sources